Could now happened to another the working owner steps forward and believes he can make sense for pe

In the pension savings of the population are about 250-300 billion. Now some politicians wondering whether to change the law so that the owners of these savings can utilize it in order to meet liquidity. Indeed, it must be considered that there is more people under middle age that this needs to be maintained, due but that is exactly due what people who have been the least attended to pay private. But this is not as simple as some people will be so, the personal pension is not liquidated. Actually seems to be in the move yet another proof of how little politicians know about the pension system, as I have repeatedly come to. Private pension savings as other custodial funds invested in various funds and mechanisms. As most people know there is liquidity in equity markets today small and not easy to free investment funds. Someone has to buy the investment that private savings today. That person will likely be difficult to find. Vandséð is that pension funds can buy assets of private pension savings in order to make payments possible. When employment was OK after pension of 150 Mia kr. a year in the budget. This is exactly what resources the State and local authorities have looked into the issue of bonds to acquire execution resources. Probably become the bounds to be set to sale to minimize property loss. If politicians open access to pension savings are therefore substantial likelihood of asset price decline of investment funds. It would then simply lead to the funding that would be at the disposal would decrease. In some cases, pension and personal pension valuable asset individuals. Especially given the fact that these assets are not enforceable. There is therefore a need to pay close attention to every aspect due of this case, obviously a household in the top note. It was more appropriate for politicians to begin to consider the interest tax credits and child benefit as I have several times been involved in previous columns. To finance it would look like abolishing Pensions and saved 600 million. kr. Treasury.
Hey Sereignin due is the property of the individual fund members, why they may not have the funds themselves? According to this news host http://eyjan.is/silfuregils/2008/12/09/tap-lifeyrissjoda/ boil seems to have remained well on those remote due objects that they have been entrusted. Board of Trustees is undemocratic and not able to move goods between the two. Many stories make for unprofessional and dishonest vinnbrogd sjodstjora. What interests are you protecting? Those who voted in the fund or those who manage them? Kv Sveinn due December 9, 2008 at. 22:10
great dj. I agree with you. Actually, I think this should be one way to finance the fiscal deficit. due One would think that these tax savings would be ca.80 billion. It is good for eyðslufé veterinarian. kv. Weekend December 9, 2008 at. 22:11
This discussion about free private pensions due is absolute trash. People have to pay tax on this so that it gets about 60% and What Do people think that it is a lot, at least I'm sure it does not change the amount of those who are disadvantaged. People should think of ways to help people. Reminds me of the junk on wages verkalýðsforingjana due and governors, the reduction of which would help the 140 þúsund.Kv Simmi December 9, 2008 at. 22:21
Could now happened to another the working owner steps forward and believes he can make sense for people. You say that it is mainly people in middle age or younger who require this, but it did not mention the pension savings. It must be clear to those who have no savings can not take advantage of this. But to deny the holding of this savings with these arguments? You seem to assume that it needs to make the assets of the funds to meet these. However, I am confident that loose money is paid to the fund each month is much more than what would have to pay them to meet these. I will also tell you how my post is so you understand it better. I'm a 41 year business. Unemployed since November 1. I started to pay into private pension when it was offered in 1997 and until ca. 5 million. I can with my own savings and unemployment survived ca. By next fall. Then I go into arrears. I have a 60 million house that I owe the 30milljónir. Unemployment alone (130,000 per month) does not begin to pay of 30 million. Ultimately defaults would lead to the loss of the house I auction and I give myself to them gained maybe 45milljónir for it. The loss that I have for them is 15 million. However, due I would have 2 million a year from private fund to maintain in order to meet the repayments on all debts. This is simple math, and you and others working forkólfar shall talk down to me this idea is incomprehensible. Remind you also that where I am, only "41, I have plenty of time ti